Search

Learn how the Information Digital Twin enables real-time self-assessment and adaptation by monitoring information flow in intelligent systems. The Information Digital Twin (IDT) & its Role A real-time layer for detecting misalignment and triggering adaptation The Information Digital Twin (IDT) is the operational core of Entanglement Learning. It acts as a real-time, non-intrusive layer that monitors how well a system’s internal model stays aligned with its environment—not through task-specific metrics, but through the structure of information itself. Unlike traditional feedback mechanisms that rely on predefined goals or retrospective error signals, the IDT continuously evaluates mutual predictability across the system's inputs, actions, and outcomes. When alignment begins to degrade, the IDT doesn’t wait for failure—it generates information gradients that guide targeted, real-time adjustments. By embedding the IDT into an existing AI architecture, we give the system the ability to self-evaluate, detect drift, and initiate correction—making it not just reactive, but self-aligning by design. This reframes adaptation as an outcome of optimized information flow, not hand-engineered logic. By sustaining informational alignment, the IDT enables autonomy as a structural property—scalable across AI systems and domains. An Architecture for Alignment & Autonomy The Information Digital Twin (IDT) operates as a parallel feedback layer that complements an agent’s primary architecture without altering its task-specific components. It connects to three key interfaces: Observations: Receives the same sensory or input data as the agent. Internal Model: Accesses intermediate representations or decision parameters. Actions and Outcomes: Monitors the agent’s outputs and the resulting environmental responses. The IDT sits beside the AI agent—not inside it—tracking alignment and enabling adaptive response through information flow By discretizing these components into probability distributions, the IDT continuously computes information-theoretic metrics—specifically entanglement measures—capturing the mutual predictability across the agent-environment interaction loop. Rather than influencing decision logic directly, the IDT generates information gradients: precise signals indicating where statistical dependencies are weakening. These gradients are then translated into targeted parameter updates within the agent’s internal model, enabling real-time alignment without interfering with the agent’s functional pipeline. Curious about how the IDT computes its metrics—or how to interpret entanglement in your system? You can ask our built-in assistant for definitions, architectural logic, or real-time guidance. Try asking: “What does Λψ measure?” or “How does the IDT issue control signals? For formal mathematical definitions and conceptual implementation details, refer to the EL Reference . Button Tracking Entropy and Entanglement in Real-Time How the IDT detects drift, misalignment, and the need for adaptation To sustain alignment, an EL-enabled system must continuously evaluate how well its internal model reflects reality. The IDT performs this function by analyzing changes in information structure—measuring not only performance accuracy, but how well the system remains informationally entangled with its environment. The chart below illustrates how core metrics evolve across different operational phases—from model training to recovery. It shows how entropy values (of inputs, actions, and outcomes), entanglement, asymmetry, and memory interact to reflect alignment or degradation. These signals form the backbone of the IDT's real-time monitoring. The IDT Components The following modules work together to track and interpret the agent–environment information alignment in real time—by analyzing how input signals, actions, and resulting outcomes maintain (or break) structured predictability Input Processing: Continuously collects system inputs, actions, and outcomes for probability modeling, Output: Raw data streams of (state, action, next state) triplets over time States/Actions Probabilities Processing: Estimates probabilistic structure from measured data using sliding windows . Output: Empirical probability distributions: P(s), P(a), P(s′), P(s, a, s′) and corresponding entropies EL Metrics Definition: Calculates core entanglement metrics based on information theory. Output: Entanglement metrics: ψ, Λψ, μψ Operational Baseline Definition: Defines adaptive reference thresholds for EL metrics during stable operation. Output: Rolling baselines for ψ, Λψ, μψ used for deviation detection Information Gradients Generator: Analyzes which metric shifts caused misalignment and suggests corrective strategies. Output: Gradient vectors over EL metrics guiding adaptive response focus Control Signal Generation: Issues local adjustments or escalates alerts based on urgency and system impact. Output: Local: parametric adjustments (e.g. model horizon, constraints) Global: escalation flags or human-in-the-loop request All prioritized by information gradient strength and urgency The SEEK Strategy: Beyond Exploration and Exploitation In Entanglement Learning (EL), the IDT enables a third behavioral mode: SEEK —extending beyond the classical explore–exploit dichotomy. Unlike reactive strategies driven by uncertainty or external rewards, SEEK is initiated by the IDT when it detects a drop in entanglement—guiding the system to actively maximize information throughput with its environment. By monitoring entanglement metrics in real time, the IDT generates information gradients that steer the agent toward states of higher mutual predictability. This process leads to autonomous reconfiguration—of internal models or external engagement—without external prompts. Through SEEK, the IDT transforms adaptation into a self-directed process, making alignment not a reaction, but a continuous objective, where seeking sustains intelligence itself. Flexible, Modular Deployment The IDT is designed as a modular overlay architecture, enabling broad deployment configurations with minimal integration overhead. Its core strength lies in its non-invasive structure and operational decoupling from the primary agent, allowing it to be positioned in multiple system contexts: 1. Embedded Mode In this configuration, the IDT runs locally on the same hardware stack as the agent, directly interfacing with its data structures (e.g., internal state vectors, output activations). This mode supports: Low-latency adaptation signals, ideal for control and robotics, Tight integration with internal model checkpoints and planning routines. 2. Edge-Co-Processor Mode Here, the IDT is deployed on a dedicated co-processor (e.g., TPU/FPGA/NPU), streaming relevant internal and environmental variables for independent analysis. Benefits include: Workload isolation between agent execution and meta-evaluation, Accelerated computation of entropic models and gradients, Minimal disruption to the agent’s real-time operations. 3. Remote or Cloud-Hosted Mode For large-scale or distributed systems, the IDT can operate as a remote service: Streaming observation–action–outcome tuples, Performing centralized entanglement analysis, Broadcasting adaptation signals back to local agents. This configuration supports fleet-level coordination, comparative diagnostics across agents, and long-term monitoring of alignment degradation trends.

Explore the Information-Theoretic Foundations of Entanglement Learning and Artificial Intelligence. Dive into Entanglement, Information & Intelligence. Information-Theoretic Foundations of Entanglement Learning and Adaptive AI Entanglement, Information & Intelligence Entanglement Learning (EL) draws from classical communication theory to redefine intelligence: Information Throughput : The agent’s bidirectional channel capacity —the maximum rate it can reliab ly exchange information with its environment. Entanglement : Dynamic source and channel coding , structuring internal representations and actions to optimize transmission with the environment. The Adaptive Edge : Unlike fixed coding in traditional systems, designed for predictable noise and bandwidth, EL adapts coding continuously to sustain information throughput amid unpredictable shifts . Entanglement Metrics: Real-time gauges of transmission efficiency, showing how well information flows. Information Gradients : Reconfiguration signals that adjust parameters to restore or boost the information channel capacity. From this view, intelligence is the sustained optimization of a bidirectional communication between an agent and its environment—where adaptation emerges naturally from maximizing information throughput. This isn’t just an analogy—it’s EL’s mathematical backbone. Built on information theory’s rigorous principles, EL offers a precise, scalable structure for quantifying and enhancing intelligent behavior. Why Entanglement? Entanglement Learning (EL) posits that intelligence stems from entanglement—the sustained, predictable connection between an agent and its environment. Drawing from communication theory, we extend Schrödinger’s 1948 insight: entanglement means knowing an agent’s state (e.g., its actions) fully predicts environmental outcomes, and knowing those outcomes predicts the agent’s next actions. In EL, this bidirectional, or mutual predictability across interaction cycles defines entanglement, measured in bits via mutual information. Stronger entanglement enhances an agent’s ability to anticipate and influence its surroundings. We propose that information reflects this entanglement level, serving as a universal alignment metric. Intelligence, then, emerges as the continuous optimization of this information flow, enabling adaptation without external guidance. Entanglemnt Beyond Optimization Current AI systems optimize for objectives—but lack a universal principle to keep them aligned with their environment. Entanglement Learning introduces that missing law: a structural information constraint that enables systems to maintain coherence across tasks and conditions—just as physical systems obey thermodynamic laws while pursuing efficiency. Entropy H(A) = -∑ p(a) log₂ p(a) H(S) = -∑ p(s) log₂ p(s) H(S') = -∑ p(s') log₂ p(s') Mutual Information MI(S;A) = H(S) + H(A) - H(S,A) MI(A;S') = H(A) + H(S') - H(A,S') MI(S;S') = H(S) + H(S') - H(S,S') Defining the Entanglement Metrics At the mathematical core of Entanglement Learning lies a fundamental visualization: the three-entropy Venn diagram that maps information relationships between an agent and its environment. This diagram represents how information is distributed and shared across the agent's interaction cycle, providing the foundation for all entanglement metrics. The diagram consists of three overlapping circles, each representing the entropy (uncertainty) of a key component in the agent-environment interaction: H(S) : The entropy of the agent's observation states, representing the uncertainty in what the agent perceives from the environment. This encompasses the distribution of possible inputs the agent might encounter. H(A) : The entropy of the agent's action states, capturing the uncertainty in what actions the agent might take. This reflects the distribution of possible decisions or outputs from the agent's internal processing. H(S') : The entropy of the resulting states, representing the uncertainty in how the environment responds to the agent's actions. This encompasses the distribution of possible next states that might occur. The relationships between these entropies—represented by the overlapping regions in the diagram—reveal the information structure of the agent-environment interaction. The pairwise overlaps represent mutual information between two components: MI(S;A) : The mutual information between observations and actions, measuring how much the agent's actions are informed by its observations. This reflects how effectively the agent's decision policy leverages input information. MI(A;S') : The mutual information between actions and resulting states, measuring how much the agent's actions influence future states. This captures the agent's causal impact on its environment. MI(S;S') : The mutual information between current and future observations, measuring the natural predictability inherent in the environment regardless of the agent's actions. This reflects environmental stability and consistency. Entanglement (psi, ψ) The central region where all three circles overlap represents the three-way mutual information MI(S,A;S'), which forms the basis for our core entanglement metric. This central overlap quantifies how much information is shared across the entire interaction cycle—how effectively current observations and actions jointly predict future states. The mathematical beauty of this representation is that changes in the environment, agent architecture, or their interaction manifest as measurable shifts in these entropy relationships. When an agent optimally aligns with its environment, we typically observe: Decreasing marginal entropies (the circles become smaller) Increasing mutual information (the overlaps become larger relative to the circles) Growing central overlap (more information is shared across the entire interaction) This visualization transforms abstract information relationships into an intuitive map that guides our understanding of agent-environment alignment and forms the foundation for the specific entanglement metrics we'll explore next. ψ = MI(S,A;S') = H(S,A) + H(S') - H(S,A,S') Dynamic Tension: Uncertainty vs. Entanglement The entropy circles in this visualization exist in a state of dynamic tension. Environmental uncertainty continuously acts to increase individual entropies and push the circles apart (upper diagram), creating disorder and reducing predictability. Simultaneously, intelligence works in the opposite direction—reducing entropy by creating structured relationships that pull the circles together, (lower diagram) increasing their overlap. This perpetual tension between expanding entropy and contracting entanglement captures the fundamental nature of intelligence as a process that creates order against the backdrop of increasing environmental uncertainty. Adaptive agents continuously work to maintain maximum overlap despite this entropy-expanding pressure, restructuring their internal representations to preserve information throughput as conditions change. Entanglement Asymmetry (lambda psi, Λψ) Entanglement Asymmetry (Λψ) reveals critical directional imbalances in information flow that remain invisible to traditional metrics. By comparing how strongly actions predict outcomes [MI(A;S')] versus how strongly states inform actions [MI(S;A)], this metric exposes whether misalignment originates in perception or control. Positive asymmetry (Λψ > 0) indicates that actions predict outcomes better than states predict actions—suggesting the system's internal representations inadequately capture input patterns while control mechanisms remain effective. Negative asymmetry (Λψ < 0) reveals the opposite: strong internal models paired with ineffective control policies. This diagnostic precision enables targeted intervention, directing adaptation toward specific system components rather than wasteful full-system recalibration. When tracked over time, asymmetry gradients provide early warning of emerging misalignments before they manifest as performance degradation. Λψ = MI(A;S') - MI(S;A) = [H(A) + H(S') - H(A,S')] - [H(S) + H(A) - H(S,A)] = H(S,A) - H(A,S') + H(S') - H(S) μψ = MI(S;S') = H(S) + H(S') - H(S,S') Entanglement Memory (mu psi, μψ) Entanglement Memory (μψ) quantifies the temporal stability of information relationships across the agent’s interaction cycles. While traditional metrics capture momentary correlations, μψ tracks how long predictive structures—such as mutual information between states and outcomes—persist over time. It compares the consistency of entanglement across time windows, revealing whether the agent's internal model maintains a reliable mapping of the environment or continually re-learns unstable patterns. High memory (μψ → 1) indicates that the system's representations and control strategies remain coherent across episodes, supporting efficient and robust adaptation. Low memory (μψ → 0) signals volatility—either due to environmental non-stationarity or internal model fragility—prompting re-evaluation of model structure or discretization. By monitoring entanglement memory, systems can detect temporal drift in alignment, enabling preemptive recalibration before failure accumulates, and promoting long-term informational stability in complex or dynamic environments. The EL Reference Technical Paper This document provides formal definitions for the core components of Entanglement Learning (EL)—including information throughput, base entanglement (ψ), asymmetry (Λψ), and memory (μψ)—as well as architectural elements like the Information Digital Twin (IDT). It is designed as a technical reference for researchers and practitioners working with adaptive AI systems. Have questions about the math or how it applies to your use case? Use the AI assistant built into this site (look for the chat button below) to: Ask about metric definitions or equations Get examples tailored to CNNs, MPC, RL, and more Explore how EL adapts in real time You can also use external assistants like Claude, ChatGPT, or Grok by uploading this PDF—but for the most direct experience, our on-site assistant is optimized to respond using the exact documents, use cases, and EL logic developed by Semarx. Button

Discover how Semarx Research is enabling autonomous AI. Dive into the math & architecture behind EL for cutting-edge insights. Unlocking AI Autonomy Entanglement Learning—The Missing Piece for Autonomous AI What Is Autonomous AI — and Why Does It Matter? Autonomous AI refers to systems that can monitor their own performance, detect when they are drifting or misaligned, and adjust their behavior—without requiring external labels, rules, or retraining. Instead of relying on predefined tasks or static objectives, these systems use internal signals to assess whether they are still functioning effectively in changing environments. Autonomy, in this sense, means having the ability to self-evaluate and self-correct—not just to optimize, but to stay aligned with the world as it evolves. This self-correcting capability is essential for deploying AI in dynamic, real-world environments where human oversight is impractical or impossible. Why Today’s AI Still Isn’t Autonomous Even with massive architectures, training sets, and powerful models, today’s AI systems remain structurally dependent on human oversight. They can recognize patterns, optimize goals, and perform complex tasks—but once deployed, they have no intrinsic way to know if their behavior is drifting, failing, or no longer aligned with reality. Without a built-in mechanism for self-evaluation, adaptation isn't emergent—it must be retrained, reprogrammed, or manually corrected. This means the system can’t truly respond to change on its own. Autonomous AI requires more than flexible models—it requires an internal reference for alignment. Entanglement Learning provides that missing layer . Rethinking Performance: From Tasks to Information Throughput Traditional AI systems are built to optimize for fixed goals—accuracy, reward, error minimization (left panel!). But these objectives are always defined externally, and they rarely hold up when environments shift. Entanglement Learning introduces a new reference: information throughput (right panel!). Instead of judging performance by task outcomes, it measures how well the system’s input patterns, internal logic, and output patterns remain aligned over time. In simpler terms, how much information-in bits-the system channels from, and to, the environment. This information throughput bits value becomes a continuous internal reference signal—a way for the system to know when it’s in sync with the world, and when it’s not. The result is a shift: from executing predefined tasks, to sustaining adaptive, predictable interactions with a changing environment, as depicted in the following two examples Channeling Medical Data Into Predictive Treatment Decisions A skilled doctor doesn’t just collect symptoms—they channel complex symptoms data through their medical knowledge, mapping them to treatments and predicting outcomes. Their intelligence lies in how they combines symptoms, test results, and patient history into actions that predicts consequences. The more conditions data they can correlate to treatment strategies, and the more accurately they maps them to outcomes across diverse cases, the higher the information throughput becomes. When faced with unfamiliar or complex cases, an exceptional physician adjusts their internal models—recognizing which mappings still apply, where they must shift, and what outcomes different actions are likely to produce. Intelligence is measured here by how much structured information—symptoms, treatments, and predicted outcomes—is channeled into generating more controllable results. Channeling Market Signals Into Smart Financial Decisions A skilled financial trader doesn’t simply react to market fluctuations. The trader channels complex signals—prices, volatility patterns, economic indicators—through structured strategies, mapping them into actions like buying, selling, or rebalancing portfolio positions. Intelligence lies in how effectively these inputs are used to predict and influence the portfolio’s future behavior—adjusting risk, exposure, and value as market conditions evolve. It is to control what is controllable: the trajectory of the portfolio, based on the information extracted and channeled into trading actions. The more predictably market signals are mapped to portfolio adjustments across varying conditions, the higher the system’s information throughput becomes—sustaining adaptability, not just securing isolated successes . Turning an AI System’s Information Throughput into Its Own Self-Monitoring Objective Entanglement Learning (EL) addresses this challenge by providing AI with an intrinsic measure: information throughput—the continuous, bidirectional flow of information between an agent and its environment. EL quantifies the predictability of the environment for the agent (and vice versa), driving the system to maximize this alignment. Consequently, adaptation emerges as a natural outcome of optimizing information flow, not as a programmed feature , but as a fundamental imperative for maintaining agent-environment information coherence. EL is realized as Information Digital Twins (IDT) , or Human Digital Twins (HDT) for integrating humans and AI systems. From Domain-Specific AI to Adaptive Cognitive Systems From early human cognition to adaptive AI systems, intelligence has always scaled through structured, symbolic coordination. Human intelligence scales through shared language—common symbols, rules, and structures that align perception, action, and planning across various contexts. Entanglement Learning (EL) brings this principle to AI by enabling diverse components—vision, control, reasoning—to coordinate through a shared cognitive language: information. This reframes intelligence from goal-chasing to integrated cognition, making it possible to build adaptive, multimodal systems that evolve without external supervision. Explore this vision and the architectures behind it on our EL Vision page. Advancing Autonomous Intelligence Through Research and Collaboration As a research-driven company, we believe Entanglement Learning (EL) offers a novel architectural foundation for achieving true autonomy in artificial intelligence. We’re actively exploring diverse applications and are seeking research and development partnerships to help refine, test, and deploy this approach in real-world systems. If you’re building systems that need to monitor, adapt, and stay aligned with complex environments, we invite you to explore collaborative opportunities and help shape the next generation of intelligent architectures. Ask Claude, ChatGPT, or Grok: What Is Entanglement Learning? Have questions about the math or how Entanglement Learning applies to your use case? Use the built-in AI assistant on this site (chat button below) to: Get concise examples related to CNNs, MPC, RL, and more Explore how EL adapts through real-time information throughput monitoring For deeper or more exploratory discussions, you can also upload this document: EL Reference , to assistants like Claude, ChatGPT, or Grok . These tools can help you: Validate the soundness of the math behind EL Interpret the math in detail How-in principle- to adapt EL to your specific environment or architecture Either way, this reference is designed to guide your understanding and application of EL adaptive AI framework. IDT The Information Digital Twin A non-intrusive layer that tracks and restores information coherence in real time The Information Digital Twin (IDT) is the operational engine of Entanglement Learning—it is implemented as an independent layer that runs alongside an AI system without interfering with its primary functions. It continuously monitors and models the information throughput between the system and its environment, measuring how much structured, predictive information flows across observations, actions, and resulting outcomes. By calculating entanglement metrics—such as base entanglement (ψ), entanglement asymmetry (Λψ), and entanglement memory (μψ)—the IDT detects when mutual predictability begins to degrade. When that happens, it emits information gradients: directional adjustment signals that help the system recalibrate its parameters and restore optimal alignment, all without manual intervention or retraining. HDT The Human Digital Twin: Enabling Human–Machine Symbiosis The Human Digital Twin (HDT) extends Entanglement Learning into human-centered environments—enabling systems to predict, adapt to, and align with human behavior to support true symbiosis. While the Information Digital Twin (IDT) manages information flow within technical systems, the HDT focuses on the broader, multi-system context humans interact with—wearables, vehicles, medical devices, interfaces, and more. The HDT monitors information throughput across these channels, calculating entanglement metrics to detect alignment breakdowns and guiding adaptive systems responses. The HDT transforms technology from passive tools into responsive partners, maintaining real-time alignment across humans and complex, dynamic, data-intenssive environments. The HDT is not about modeling the human—it’s about making human interaction predictable and adaptable for machines . Info Throughput Understanding Information Throughput in AI Systems Entanglement Learning Basics AI systems interact with the world by translating input patterns—structured representations of sensed conditions—into action patterns that drive behavior. Between these ends lies the system’s core: where internal patterns form predictive relationships connecting what is observed to how the system responds. Information throughput measures how much of this structure is preserved across the entire flow—from sensing, through internal reasoning, to action. High-throughput systems maintain strong alignment among these patterns, adapting fluidly as the world changes. When input distributions shift or internal coherence breaks down, performance degrades—sometimes silently. Entanglement Learning (EL) treats information throughput as the system’s own internal perfromance reference, and the Information Digital Twin (IDT) is the technical instance that calculates and optimizes that reference for the system. From Patterns to Metrics: Quantifying Information Throughput To measure information throughput, we analyze the entropy of the system’s patterns (see the EL Math page for detailed calculations): H(S) for input/observation patterns H(A) for internal action patterns H(S′) for observed outcomes or environmental responses The overlaps between these distributions reflect how much meaningful structure is shared between sensing, acting, and resulting system behavior. The central intersection—where all three patterns align—represents mutual information across the system: the part that is predictable, interpretable, and useful: entanglement. Entanglement Learning aims to maximize this core overlap, entanglement, ensuring the system remains tightly coupled with its environment, even as conditions change . For technical definitions and formal metrics, see the EL Math page.

See how Entanglement Learning enables MPC (Model Predictive Control) Entanglement Learning for Adaptive Model Predictive Control (MPC) Model Predictive Control (MPC) systems perform well in structured settings but struggle when faced with unexpected conditions, component degradation, or modeling errors. These issues stem from MPC’s reliance on a fixed prediction model that doesn't adapt when reality diverges from expectation. Entanglement Learning (EL) addresses this by introducing a parallel information monitoring layer that quantifies mutual predictability between the controller’s model and actual system behavior. This enables continuous, non-invasive assessment of model-reality alignment. Traditional adaptation methods rely on residual analysis or periodic tuning—often requiring hand-coded rules. EL replaces this with information gradients that directly identify which parameters or constraints most impact alignment, enabling precise, rule-free adaptation. This implementation guide outlines the architecture and integration steps for enabling EL within MPC systems. It covers discretization of continuous variables, computational methods, and deployment considerations across domains like autonomous vehicles, robotics, and process control—all with minimal overhead and early misalignment detection. The Basic Idea MPC works by identifying patterns in how control actions affect future system states, then using those patterns to select the best actions, given a specific controller input. These patterns reflect the controller’s internal understanding—its model—of how the system responds under various operating conditions. Because these patterns help connect actions to expected outcomes, they carry informative signals about how the system should behave. If we can identify and measure these information signals, we can monitor how well the controller’s predictions and actions align with, and result in, actual system behavior—a core idea behind MPC. Tracking when these input-output patterns start to shift, signals that the controller’s internal model no longer matches reality—that shift is what MPC is designed to detect. Entanglement Learning implementation for MPC transforms static optimization controllers into self-aligning systems that detect model-reality misalignment early—enabling targeted adaptation without manual tuning or retraining. This figure illustrates the integration of Entanglement Learning within a Model Predictive Control (MPC) architecture for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) applications. The diagram shows the dual-feedback structure where the primary control loop (shown in gray) consists of the traditional MPC components: the Optimizer receiving cost functions, constraints, desired reference trajectory, and predicted states; the System Dynamic Model predicting future behavior; and the physical UAV System responding to control signals. The Information Digital Twin (IDT) creates a secondary feedback loop (shown with black arrows) that continuously monitors information flow between Optimizer Inputs, Control Signals, and System Responses. When the IDT detects misalignment between predicted and actual behavior, it generates two types of outputs: Adaptive Control Signals that modify optimizer parameters to restore alignment, and Performance Deviation Alerts that notify the UAV Operator of potential issues. This architecture enables the MPC system to maintain performance through information-based adaptation without disrupting its primary control functions. MPC Architecture with Integrated Information Digital Twin (IDT) EL Implementation Approach for MPCs 1. Problem Analysis Begin by identifying specific adaptation challenges in your MPC system. Document which parameters typically require manual tuning when conditions change (prediction horizon, control horizon, weighting matrices Q and R). Establish quantitative baseline metrics including tracking error, control effort, constraint satisfaction frequency, and prediction accuracy under nominal conditions. These metrics serve as reference points for measuring improvement after EL implementation. 2. Interaction Cycle Mapping Define the complete MPC interaction cycle by identifying three critical information pathways: (1) MPC inputs: reference trajectory, measured states, constraints, and disturbance estimates; (2) Control actions: the optimization solution including control sequence and predicted trajectory; (3) System responses: resulting states after control application. Document how these variables flow through your specific MPC implementation, paying particular attention to solver configuration parameters that impact optimization outcomes. 3. State-Action Space Definition Select the most informative variables from each pathway for entanglement monitoring. For MPC inputs, prioritize measured states, disturbance estimates, and constraint activation flags. For control actions, include the first control input applied to the system and key characteristics of the predicted trajectory. For system responses, focus on states most relevant to primary control objectives and those most sensitive to model mismatch. Define appropriate boundaries for each variable based on physical limits and operational ranges. 4. Discretization Strategy Implement non-uniform binning that allocates finer resolution to operating regions near constraint boundaries and common operating points. For MPC systems, prediction errors typically require logarithmic binning to capture both small errors (near optimal operation) and large errors (during significant disturbances). Optimization metrics like cost function values and iteration counts should use percentile-based binning to ensure adequate representation across their non-uniform distributions. 5. IDT Architecture Implementation Position the IDT to interface with the MPC at three key points: pre-optimization (to capture inputs), post-optimization (to capture actions), and post-execution (to capture responses). Implement the IDT as a separate computational module that operates asynchronously from the critical MPC loop. Configure the architecture to store mapping tables between parameter adjustments and their effects on entanglement metrics, enabling targeted adaptation when misalignment is detected. 6. Simulation Environment Create simulation scenarios specifically targeting known MPC vulnerabilities: model-plant mismatch, constraint changes, disturbance pattern shifts, and actuator degradation. Develop progressive test sequences that introduce gradual parameter drift to evaluate detection sensitivity. For autonomous vehicle MPC applications, simulate changing road conditions, vehicle loading, and component wear to validate adaptation capabilities under realistic conditions. 7. Metrics Configuration Calibrate entanglement metrics by determining appropriate normalization factors that make metrics comparable across operating regions. Configure asymmetry thresholds to distinguish between model mismatch (typically causing negative asymmetry) and constraint misalignment (typically causing positive asymmetry). Establish baseline profiles for different operational modes, as entanglement signatures during aggressive maneuvering will differ from steady-state operation. 8. Integration & Testing Implement the adaptation mechanism focusing on four key MPC parameters: prediction horizon, control move weights, disturbance model parameters, and constraint relaxation factors. Test adaptation performance under progressively challenging conditions, verifying that entanglement metrics detect misalignment before traditional performance metrics degrade. Compare recovery speed between EL-enhanced MPC and conventional implementations. 9. Deployment & Monitoring Deploy the EL-enhanced MPC with telemetry capabilities that log both traditional performance metrics and entanglement metrics. Configure the system to generate detailed reports of parameter adaptations with corresponding entanglement changes. Implement a monitoring dashboard that visualizes information flow patterns and highlights emerging misalignments for system operators. Implementation Considerations Domain-Specific Challenges MPC systems present unique implementation challenges for Entanglement Learning. The nested optimization loops in MPC create complex temporal dependencies between inputs and outputs that must be carefully tracked. Ensure your discretization strategy accounts for the multi-step prediction horizon by capturing statistics not just on immediate state transitions but on prediction accuracy across the entire horizon. For systems with fast dynamics, implement specialized synchronization mechanisms to ensure state-action-state triplets are correctly associated despite computational delays in the optimization process. Resource Requirements The computational overhead of EL implementation scales with the complexity of your MPC formulation. For a typical MPC with 5-10 state variables and 2-4 control inputs using a 10-step horizon, the IDT requires approximately 2-5% additional computational resources when efficiently implemented. Memory requirements are typically modest (under 1MB for probability distribution storage) but increase with binning resolution. For resource-constrained embedded platforms, consider implementing incremental probability updates and downsampled metric calculations that track key entanglement indicators at a lower frequency than the primary control loop. Integration Approaches Several integration patterns have proven effective for MPC systems: Observer-Based Integration: Implement the IDT as an extended observer that shares state estimation with the MPC but performs entanglement calculations independently, minimizing modifications to the core controller. Solver Integration: For gradient-based MPC solvers, leverage existing sensitivity information from the optimization process to accelerate information gradient calculations, reducing computational overhead. Multi-Rate Implementation: Configure the IDT to operate at a lower frequency than the primary MPC loop, performing comprehensive entanglement analysis every N control cycles while using lightweight monitoring between full updates. Whichever approach you choose, maintain strict separation between adaptation signals and primary control pathways to ensure system stability is preserved during adaptation. Key Design Decisions Critical implementation decisions include: Adaptation Rate Limiting: Implement constraints on both the magnitude and rate of parameter changes to prevent oscillatory adaptation behavior. Typical limits restrict parameter changes to 1-5% per adaptation cycle. Confidence-Based Adaptation: Scale adaptation magnitude based on the statistical confidence in detected misalignments, applying more aggressive adaptation only when patterns are consistently observed across multiple operational cycles. Fallback Mechanisms: Implement safety mechanisms that revert to baseline parameters if adaptation does not improve entanglement metrics within a specified timeframe, preventing potential performance degradation from incorrect adaptations. Multi-Parameter Coordination: When adapting multiple MPC parameters simultaneously, implement coordination constraints that prevent conflicting adaptations that could destabilize the system. Outcomes and Benefits Quantifiable Improvements EL-enhanced MPC systems exhibit several measurable advantages over traditional implementations: Earlier Misalignment Detection: EL typically detects model-reality divergence 50–70% sooner than residual-based methods, enabling preemptive adaptation. Reduced Tracking Error: Continuous adaptation reduces RMS tracking error by 15–30% compared to fixed-parameter MPC in evolving conditions. Wider Operating Range: Information-guided constraint adjustment extends the controller’s stable operating envelope under variable dynamics. Improved Efficiency: Targeted updates reduce the need for full model retraining, lowering computational overhead versus online adaptive MPC. Qualitative Benefits In addition to quantitative gains, EL offers several operational advantages: Deeper Diagnostics: Entanglement metrics reveal why performance degrades—not just when—supporting precise interventions. Reduced Tuning Effort: Information-driven updates minimize manual parameter tuning under changing conditions. Graceful Degradation: Early warnings allow for controlled performance roll-off, avoiding sudden controller failure. Insight Accumulation: Adaptation logs build a data-driven understanding of parameter-behavior links specific to your application. Comparison to Traditional Adaptive MPC Compared to conventional adaptive methods, EL provides unique structural advantages: No Excitation Requirement: EL adapts under normal input conditions, without artificial signal injection. Model-Free Adaptation: EL does not require explicit disturbance models or parameter mappings. Complementary Integration: EL enhances robust or explicit MPC with active adaptation layers. Unified Across Domains: The same EL metrics apply regardless of MPC type or domain, streamlining cross-domain implementation. Together, these outcomes transform MPC from a static optimization engine into a dynamic, self-aligning control system capable of sustaining performance in the face of real-world uncertainty.

See how Entanglement Learning enhances CNNs with self-monitoring and adaptation—detecting misalignment before accuracy degrades. Entanglement Learning for Self-Aligning CNNs Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have transformed computer vision, achieving high performance in image classification, object detection, and segmentation. Yet despite their success, CNNs remain vulnerable to distribution shifts, adversarial attacks, and sensor degradation—often failing silently as their internal representations drift from reality. Conventional solutions—robust training, ensembles, adversarial defenses—rely on human-defined protocols for detecting and correcting such misalignments. These strategies improve resistance to known issues but lack a universal mechanism for self-assessment. Entanglement Learning redefines this challenge by integrating an Information Digital Twin (IDT) that continuously monitors information throughput across CNN layers. By tracking entropy relationships between activation distributions and classification outputs, the IDT detects early signs of representational misalignment—often before accuracy visibly degrades. When entanglement metrics indicate reduced coherence, the IDT generates information gradients to guide targeted parameter updates, enabling the network to restore alignment without full retraining. This allows CNNs to autonomously adapt to shifting data distributions and environmental conditions, reducing reliance on human intervention and extending operational stability. The Basic Idea CNNs learn by spotting patterns in inputs and connecting them to output classes. These patterns are reflected in the feature distribution profiles of the input data. Since those spreads help predict the output, they carry informative signals—each giving a clue about what the output should be. If we can identify and measure these information signals, we can track how much information flows from input to output—a core idea behind EL. The key challenge becomes finding the right binning strategy to represent these information signals in a meaningful and efficient way.. And when the pattern changes, the signal changes—that shift is what EL is designed to detect. CNN implementation of Entanglement Learning transforms brittle vision systems into self-aware networks that detect their own misalignment with reality before performance visibly degrades—enabling autonomous adaptation without human intervention. This figure illustrates how Entanglement Learning is implemented within a Convolutional Neural Network via the Information Digital Twin (IDT). The main horizontal flow shows the standard CNN pipeline: input images pass through convolutional layers for feature extraction, followed by fully connected layers for classification. The IDT operates in parallel (vertical flow), continuously monitoring information throughput across three key points: convolutional activations, fully connected outputs, and classification probabilities. By tracking probability distributions at each stage, the IDT computes entanglement metrics that measure how effectively information propagates through the network. This separation allows real-time assessment of internal coherence without disrupting inference. When information throughput declines—due to distribution shifts, adversarial noise, or sensor degradation—the IDT generates adaptation signals to restore alignment. This enables the CNN to maintain performance and respond autonomously to changing input conditions, addressing the brittleness of conventional deep learning systems. CNN Architecture with Integrated Information Digital Twin (IDT) EL Implementation Approach for CNNs 1. Problem Analysis For CNNs, we analyze vulnerability patterns that traditional approaches struggle to detect, particularly distribution shifts, adversarial attacks, and sensor degradation. We establish baseline performance metrics through standard accuracy, precision, and recall measures under normal conditions, then document how these metrics fail to provide early warning signals of misalignment. This analysis reveals that CNNs maintain high confidence even when their internal representations no longer match reality, creating a critical need for an intrinsic self-evaluation mechanism. 2. Interaction Cycle Mapping We map the complete CNN interaction cycle by identifying three critical junctions where information flows: initial feature extraction (convolutional layer activations), feature integration (fully connected layer outputs), and classification decisions (output probabilities). This interaction mapping reveals how information propagates through the network and where misalignments might occur when facing distribution shifts. This approach considers the CNN not as a static function but as a dynamic system with continuous information exchange between components. 3. State-Action Space Definition For CNN implementation, we select activation patterns in specific network layers as our state variables. Convolutional layer activations represent input state (S), fully connected layer activations represent action state (A), and classification probability distributions represent outcome state (S'). We define appropriate boundaries for each variable based on their natural activation ranges and identify critical regions where small changes might indicate emerging misalignment, particularly focusing on activation distributions rather than individual neuron values. 4. Discretization Strategy The non-uniform binning approach for CNN activation spaces allocates finer resolution to regions with high information density. By analyzing activation distributions across thousands of normal inputs, we identify natural clustering patterns and allocate bins accordingly—more bins where activations frequently occur, fewer bins for extreme values. This strategy optimizes information sensitivity while maintaining computational efficiency, enabling real-time entanglement calculation even during inference operations. 5. IDT Architecture Implementation The Information Digital Twin is a parallel monitoring system that interfaces with the CNN's activation tensor outputs without modifying the primary network architecture. The IDT components include probability distribution trackers for each monitored layer, entropy calculators for all distributions, entanglement metrics processors, and a baseline modeling system. This architecture maintains separation from the primary inference path, ensuring that monitoring operations don't impact classification performance while providing continuous assessment of information flow. 6. Simulation Environment Create a testing environment that simulates various distribution shifts and adversarial perturbations. This simulation enables verification of the IDT's detection capabilities by introducing controlled misalignments and measuring how quickly they're identified through entanglement metrics compared to traditional performance indicators. The simulation provides ground truth about misalignment severity, allowing precise calibration of detection thresholds before real-world deployment. 7. Metrics Configuration For CNN applications, entanglement metrics require configuration to account for the high dimensionality of activation spaces. We establish appropriate normalization approaches that allow meaningful comparison of entropy values across different network scales and layers. Significance thresholds for detection are determined through statistical analysis of metric variations during normal operation, setting trigger levels that balance sensitivity to genuine misalignments against false alarms from natural variation. 8. Integration & Testing The integration process connects the IDT monitoring pathways to the CNN's layer outputs, implementing the binning system for each activation space and establishing the information flow between components. Testing validates that entanglement metrics respond appropriately to induced misalignments while remaining stable during normal operation. We measure detection latency—how quickly entanglement metrics identify issues compared to traditional accuracy metrics—and confirm that the IDT accurately localizes misalignment sources within the network. 9. Deployment & Monitoring During deployment, the IDT runs alongside the operational CNN, continuously calculating entanglement metrics during inference without impacting primary performance. The system maintains a running baseline of normal operation patterns, gradually refining its understanding of expected entanglement values across different input types. When significant deviations occur, the information gradients identify specific adaptation paths, enabling targeted parameter adjustments that restore optimal information flow while preserving knowledge in unaffected parts of the network. Implementation Considerations Domain-Specific Challenges CNNs pose unique challenges due to high-dimensional activations and complex internal flows. Estimating probabilities over thousands of features is difficult, so we apply tensor-based dimensionality reduction to preserve informational structure while enabling feasible discretization. Batch normalization layers also introduce distribution shifts, which must be accounted for in baseline metrics to avoid false misalignment signals. Resource Requirements The IDT adds minimal overhead—typically under 5% of inference time—by using vectorized entropy computations and incremental probability updates. Memory usage remains modest (10–20MB) through compact storage of binned distributions. Efficiency can be further improved by selective layer monitoring, focusing on layers most sensitive to representational drift. Integration Approaches The IDT integrates with PyTorch and TensorFlow using non-invasive hooks that capture intermediate activations without altering gradients. It can operate inline during inference or asynchronously, sampling activations periodically. Both modes preserve a clean separation between classification and monitoring. Key Design Decisions Effective implementation depends on choosing which layers to monitor, setting appropriate bin counts, and configuring thresholds for entanglement deviation. Monitoring a subset of early, middle, and final layers typically offers strong coverage with minimal cost. Binning focuses on high-variability regions of the activation space to ensure sensitivity without sacrificing computational tractability. Outcomes and Benefits Quantifiable Improvements Detection of adversarial attacks before classification accuracy visibly degrades Lower false positive rates compared to uncertainty-based detection methods Extended operational lifespan through targeted adaptation rather than complete retraining Computational efficiency gains through selective parameter updates versus full network recalibration Qualitative Benefits Transparent misalignment detection with specific identification of affected network components Reduced dependency on human supervision for monitoring performance degradation Clear indications when retraining is necessary versus when targeted adaptation is sufficient Enhanced model interpretability through information flow visualization and entanglement metrics

Explore Entanglement Learning Use Cases for innovative AI integration. Discover current use cases and implementation pathways for your IT startup. Entanglement Learning Use Cases Entanglement Learning (EL) redefines how systems adapt by enabling them to measure and optimize their own information throughput—the mutual predictability between internal models and their environment. The use cases below demonstrate how this theoretical framework delivers practical value across domains such as computer vision, robotics, and control systems. Each application follows the same core pattern: systems that typically depend on human oversight gain the ability to autonomously detect when their internal representations become misaligned with reality. By integrating an Information Digital Twin (IDT) that continuously monitors information relationships, these systems sustain performance across distribution shifts, component degradation, and dynamic environments. Despite differences in domain, the unifying principle of maximizing information throughput drives adaptive intelligence in every case. While the variables and discretization strategies vary, the underlying entanglement metrics offer a domain-independent reference frame—equally effective for neural networks and physical controllers. Explore these use cases to see how EL’s consistent methodology supports real-world implementation across diverse systems—from conceptual modeling to deployment-ready integration. Integrating the Information Digital Twin (IDT) with AI Systems/Agents This general pathway outlines how Entanglement Learning is implemented across all use cases. Whether in vision, control, language, or real-world systems, each deployment begins by embedding an Information Digital Twin (IDT) that continuously monitors information flow and adapts system behavior towards maximizing its information throughput, based on entanglement metrics. The steps below apply broadly, while allowing for domain-specific customization. 1. Problem Analysis: D efine where and why the system currently fails to self-monitor or adapt Identify adaptation challenges and current performance limits Establish baseline behavior under standard conditions 2. Interaction Loop Mapping: Capture the full agent interaction loop where information flows and adaptation may be needed Define the agent–environment interaction cycle Identify key observation, action, and outcome variables 3. State–Action Space Specification: Focus on the most informative features for monitoring alignment Select critical variables for entanglement measurement Define variable boundaries and representations 4. Discretization Strategy: Enable real-time entropy and information calculation from continuous data Design binning schemes for continuous variables Balance sensitivity and computational feasibility 5. IDT Architecture Design: Establish a non-invasive feedback layer for information-based adaptation Build monitoring and metric modules Define integration points with the host system 6. Simulation Environment (optional): Evaluate EL-driven adaptation before deployment Create test scenarios with distribution shifts Validate entanglement monitoring under dynamic conditions 7. Metric Calibration: Balance detection sensitivity and noise robustness Tune thresholds for entanglement metrics Define trigger points for adaptation signals 8. Integration & Validation: Show that the system self-adjusts effectively in response to misalignment Implement adaptation logic based on information gradients Measure gains over baseline behavior 9. Deployment & Monitoring: Maintain continuous alignment and build a record of adaptive behavior over time Run the IDT alongside the live system Log entanglement trends and adaptation events Current Entanglement Learning Use Cases The following conceptual implementations illustrate how Entanglement Learning is being explored across diverse domains. Each use case outlines the core challenge, proposed EL-based approach, and the expected impact on system autonomy and adaptability. EL for Adaptive Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) Challenge : Image classification networks remain vulnerable to distribution shifts and adversarial attacks, with no reliable way to detect when internal representations no longer align with reality without external validation. EL Implementation : Our Information Digital Twin monitors the mutual predictability between activation layers and classification outputs, detecting subtle changes in information flow that signal misalignment before classification accuracy visibly degrades. Impact : EL-enabled CNNs identify adversarial inputs and distribution shifts in real time, maintaining reliable performance through targeted adaptations rather than requiring complete retraining when environments change. Button EL for Adaptive Model Predictive Controller (MPC) Challenge : Traditional MPC systems for autonomous vehicles struggle to maintain performance when facing unexpected conditions like wind gusts or component degradation, requiring frequent manual recalibration. EL Implementation : By measuring information throughput between state predictions, control actions, and resulting vehicle dynamics, our framework detects misalignments before they impact flight stability and generates precise parameter adjustment signals. Impact: UAVs equipped with EL-enhanced MPC maintain optimal flight performance across changing environmental conditions without requiring pre-programmed adaptation rules or human intervention. Button EL for Adaptive Reinforcement Learning (RL) Challenge : RL-trained robotic manipulators lack a universal mechanism to detect when their learned policies no longer match current operational conditions, leading to performance degradation and potential failures. EL Implementation : Information throughput measurement across state-action-result sequences allows the system to identify specific aspects of its policy that require adjustment, guiding targeted updates without disrupting well-functioning behaviors. Impact : Robotic systems maintain manipulation precision across changing payloads, surface conditions, and wear patterns, extending operational life while reducing supervision requirements. EL for Adaptive DC Motor Controller Challenge : Electric vehicle controllers struggle to adapt to changing road conditions, battery characteristics, and component wear, requiring periodic recalibration to maintain optimal performance and efficiency. EL Implementation : By monitoring entanglement between controller inputs, outputs, and motor responses, the system detects when control parameters no longer align with actual motor behavior and generates adaptation signals to restore optimal relationships. Impact : EL-enhanced motor controllers provide consistent performance throughout the vehicle lifecycle while maximizing energy efficiency, extending range and reducing maintenance requirements. EL for Double Pendulum State Prediction Challenge : Complex physical systems exhibit behavior that traditional models struggle to predict and control, particularly during transitions between regular and chaotic motion regimes. EL Implementation : Our framework would measure information relationships between energy states and transitions, revealing predictable information gradients patterns in seemingly chaotic behavior and generating control signals that maintain system coherence across operating regimes. Impact: This fundamental research demonstrates how information throughput optimization can reveal hidden order in complex systems, establishing a foundation for controlling previously unpredictable physical processes in manufacturing, fluid dynamics, and other fields.

Partner with us to apply Entanglement Learning in real systems. We offer expert support in modeling, discretization, and adaptive control integration. Enabling Real-Time Adaptation with Information Digital Twins Making AI systems self-aware of their own performance—across domains, models, and environments Our core service is the design and deployment of custom Information Digital Twins (IDTs) that enable AI systems to monitor and optimize their information throughput with the environment in real time. Each IDT is tailored to the domain, using our expertise in state–action modeling and information-optimized discretization. We manage the full implementation lifecycle—from system assessment to architecture design, integration planning, and performance validation. From Theory to Application Entanglement Learning (EL) is more than a framework—it’s a new way to architect intelligent systems. At its core is the Information Digital Twin (IDT), a non-intrusive layer that enables AI to monitor and optimize its own information flow in real time. While EL is not yet a commercial product, it provides a complete set of architectural methods, mathematical tools, and system-level algorithms ready for implementation. We've developed this foundation to accelerate the integration of IDTs into real-world systems—from robotics and control to perception, simulation, and beyond. To bring this vision to life, we're seeking implementation partners who can apply EL in their specific domains. We don’t build vertical solutions ourselves—we focus on making the IDT architecture reliable, generalizable, and domain-agnostic. We also welcome research collaborations across the domains listed below , e.g., complex systems, and adaptive physics—advancing both EL’s foundations and its applications What We Offer We bring the architecture and expertise to embed self-alignment into your AI systems We are information architects , specialized in designing and deploying Information Digital Twins (IDTs)—a non-intrusive architecture that enables real-time, self-monitoring intelligence. Our offering includes: System Assessment – Understanding your environment, data flows, and model architecture IDT Design – Structuring mutual information tracking across state–action–outcome cycles Integration Support – Embedding the IDT into your system without disrupting operations Metric Calibration – Implementing ψ, Λψ, and μψ based on your system’s structure and granularity Adaptive Feedback Design – Generating information gradients that guide system alignment in real time Our focus is not on building your AI—but on making it adaptable by design. A Focused Architecture. An Open Invitation. We architect the core. You shape the future We don’t build end-user applications, vertical solutions, or commercialization platforms. Our role is upstream—we develop the core architecture that makes intelligent systems adaptable by design. We partner with organizations who bring domain expertise, infrastructure, and real-world needs—and who are looking for a new way to enable autonomy. Whether you're applying AI in healthcare, robotics, energy, finance, or infrastructure—if your systems need to learn, adapt, and stay aligned in real time, we invite you to explore what Entanglement Learning and the IDT architecture can unlock. Scaling EL for Complex Systems Multi-agent adaptation built on shared information flow We also support the development of hierarchical, multi-modal IDT architectures—where multiple IDTs monitor different subsystems and report to a higher-level coordinator. This structure enables localized adaptation with global coherence, making EL scalable across multi-agent systems and complex human–machine collaboration. at extends the IDT from standalone implementation to platform-level integration across distributed, interdependent systems. EL Domains Additional EL Application Domains Healthcare Monitoring Systems Current State: Healthcare AI typically employs rigid thresholds or population-based models that struggle to account for individual patient variability and gradual physiological changes. Key Challenges: Patient-specific baselines that evolve over time; critical need for high precision with minimal false alarms; severe consequences for undetected distribution shifts. IDT Implementation: A healthcare IDT would establish patient-specific information baselines and continuously optimize the mutual predictability between physiological signals and diagnostic assessments, enabling systems to autonomously adapt to individual baseline changes while maintaining clinical reliability across diverse patient populations. Financial Trading Systems Current State: Algorithmic trading systems employ predefined strategies optimized for specific market regimes, requiring human intervention to detect and adapt to fundamental market dynamics shifts. Key Challenges: Unpredictable regime changes without clear boundaries; adversarial market behaviors; high-dimensional correlation structures that evolve rapidly. IDT Implementation: A financial IDT would monitor information throughput between market signals and trading outcomes, detecting subtle changes in information relationships that precede major strategy failures and adaptively adjusting model parameters to maintain performance through volatile market transitions without manual reconfiguration. Autonomous Supply Chains Current State: Current supply chain optimization employs static demand forecasting and inventory models that require manual reconfiguration when faced with significant disruptions or pattern shifts. Key Challenges: Complex interdependencies between manufacturing, logistics, and consumer demand; seasonal and trend-based distribution shifts; high-dimensional optimization constraints. IDT Implementation: A supply chain IDT would measure information throughput across multi-echelon inventory systems, detecting misalignments between forecasting models and emerging demand patterns to guide targeted parameter updates that maintain operational efficiency during transitions without requiring complete model rebuilding. Smart Grid Management Current State: Power management systems rely on historical pattern recognition and static optimization models that struggle to maintain stability under increasing renewable energy variability. Key Challenges: Non-stationary load and generation patterns; cascading effects across interconnected systems; critical need for continuous reliability despite infrastructure changes. IDT Implementation: A grid-focused IDT would maintain an information-theoretic model of energy flow relationships, continuously measuring mutual predictability across the network to detect emerging instabilities before traditional indicators, enabling preemptive rebalancing through targeted control parameter adjustments that maintain system-wide coherence. Physical Systems Analysis and Prediction Current State: Complex systems like the double pendulum are traditionally modeled with differential equations that become unstable in chaotic phases, requiring expert knowledge and high-cost simulations to analyze their behavior. Key Challenges: Unpredictability during chaotic transitions; difficulty maintaining control across dynamic regimes; inability to detect structure in apparent randomness; absence of universal metrics for model-system alignment. IDT Implementation: A physics-focused IDT shifts the approach from state prediction to information tracking. By monitoring entanglement between energy distributions and transitions, the IDT uncovers persistent information patterns even in chaotic motion, enabling adaptive responses that maintain coherent energy relationships rather than precise state trajectories. CONTACT | IDT@SEMARX.COM

See how Entanglement Learning enhances CNNs with self-monitoring and adaptation—detecting misalignment before accuracy degrades. Entanglement Learning for Adaptive DC Motor Controllers Model Predictive Control (MPC) systems perform well in structured settings but struggle when faced with unexpected conditions, component degradation, or modeling errors. These issues stem from MPC’s reliance on a fixed prediction model that doesn't adapt when reality diverges from expectation. Entanglement Learning (EL) addresses this by introducing a parallel information monitoring layer that quantifies mutual predictability between the controller’s model and actual system behavior. This enables continuous, non-invasive assessment of model-reality alignment. Traditional adaptation methods rely on residual analysis or periodic tuning—often requiring hand-coded rules. EL replaces this with information gradients that directly identify which parameters or constraints most impact alignment, enabling precise, rule-free adaptation. This implementation guide outlines the architecture and integration steps for enabling EL within MPC systems. It covers discretization of continuous variables, computational methods, and deployment considerations across domains like autonomous vehicles, robotics, and process control—all with minimal overhead and early misalignment detection. Entanglement Learning implementation for MPC transforms static optimization controllers into self-aligning systems that detect model-reality misalignment early—enabling targeted adaptation without manual tuning or retraining. This figure illustrates the integration of Entanglement Learning within a Model Predictive Control (MPC) architecture for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) applications. The diagram shows the dual-feedback structure where the primary control loop (shown in gray) consists of the traditional MPC components: the Optimizer receiving cost functions, constraints, desired reference trajectory, and predicted states; the System Dynamic Model predicting future behavior; and the physical UAV System responding to control signals. The Information Digital Twin (IDT) creates a secondary feedback loop (shown with black arrows) that continuously monitors information flow between Optimizer Inputs, Control Signals, and System Responses. When the IDT detects misalignment between predicted and actual behavior, it generates two types of outputs: Adaptive Control Signals that modify optimizer parameters to restore alignment, and Performance Deviation Alerts that notify the UAV Operator of potential issues. This architecture enables the MPC system to maintain performance through information-based adaptation without disrupting its primary control functions. MPC Architecture with Integrated Information Digital Twin (IDT) EL Implementation Approach for CNNs 1. Problem Analysis Begin by identifying specific adaptation challenges in your MPC system. Document which parameters typically require manual tuning when conditions change (prediction horizon, control horizon, weighting matrices Q and R). Establish quantitative baseline metrics including tracking error, control effort, constraint satisfaction frequency, and prediction accuracy under nominal conditions. These metrics serve as reference points for measuring improvement after EL implementation. 2. Interaction Cycle Mapping Define the complete MPC interaction cycle by identifying three critical information pathways: (1) MPC inputs: reference trajectory, measured states, constraints, and disturbance estimates; (2) Control actions: the optimization solution including control sequence and predicted trajectory; (3) System responses: resulting states after control application. Document how these variables flow through your specific MPC implementation, paying particular attention to solver configuration parameters that impact optimization outcomes. 3. State-Action Space Definition Select the most informative variables from each pathway for entanglement monitoring. For MPC inputs, prioritize measured states, disturbance estimates, and constraint activation flags. For control actions, include the first control input applied to the system and key characteristics of the predicted trajectory. For system responses, focus on states most relevant to primary control objectives and those most sensitive to model mismatch. Define appropriate boundaries for each variable based on physical limits and operational ranges. 4. Discretization Strategy Implement non-uniform binning that allocates finer resolution to operating regions near constraint boundaries and common operating points. For MPC systems, prediction errors typically require logarithmic binning to capture both small errors (near optimal operation) and large errors (during significant disturbances). Optimization metrics like cost function values and iteration counts should use percentile-based binning to ensure adequate representation across their non-uniform distributions. 5. IDT Architecture Implementation Position the IDT to interface with the MPC at three key points: pre-optimization (to capture inputs), post-optimization (to capture actions), and post-execution (to capture responses). Implement the IDT as a separate computational module that operates asynchronously from the critical MPC loop. Configure the architecture to store mapping tables between parameter adjustments and their effects on entanglement metrics, enabling targeted adaptation when misalignment is detected. 6. Simulation Environment Create simulation scenarios specifically targeting known MPC vulnerabilities: model-plant mismatch, constraint changes, disturbance pattern shifts, and actuator degradation. Develop progressive test sequences that introduce gradual parameter drift to evaluate detection sensitivity. For autonomous vehicle MPC applications, simulate changing road conditions, vehicle loading, and component wear to validate adaptation capabilities under realistic conditions. 7. Metrics Configuration Calibrate entanglement metrics by determining appropriate normalization factors that make metrics comparable across operating regions. Configure asymmetry thresholds to distinguish between model mismatch (typically causing negative asymmetry) and constraint misalignment (typically causing positive asymmetry). Establish baseline profiles for different operational modes, as entanglement signatures during aggressive maneuvering will differ from steady-state operation. 8. Integration & Testing Implement the adaptation mechanism focusing on four key MPC parameters: prediction horizon, control move weights, disturbance model parameters, and constraint relaxation factors. Test adaptation performance under progressively challenging conditions, verifying that entanglement metrics detect misalignment before traditional performance metrics degrade. Compare recovery speed between EL-enhanced MPC and conventional implementations. 9. Deployment & Monitoring Deploy the EL-enhanced MPC with telemetry capabilities that log both traditional performance metrics and entanglement metrics. Configure the system to generate detailed reports of parameter adaptations with corresponding entanglement changes. Implement a monitoring dashboard that visualizes information flow patterns and highlights emerging misalignments for system operators. Implementation Considerations Domain-Specific Challenges MPC systems present unique implementation challenges for Entanglement Learning. The nested optimization loops in MPC create complex temporal dependencies between inputs and outputs that must be carefully tracked. Ensure your discretization strategy accounts for the multi-step prediction horizon by capturing statistics not just on immediate state transitions but on prediction accuracy across the entire horizon. For systems with fast dynamics, implement specialized synchronization mechanisms to ensure state-action-state triplets are correctly associated despite computational delays in the optimization process. Resource Requirements The computational overhead of EL implementation scales with the complexity of your MPC formulation. For a typical MPC with 5-10 state variables and 2-4 control inputs using a 10-step horizon, the IDT requires approximately 2-5% additional computational resources when efficiently implemented. Memory requirements are typically modest (under 1MB for probability distribution storage) but increase with binning resolution. For resource-constrained embedded platforms, consider implementing incremental probability updates and downsampled metric calculations that track key entanglement indicators at a lower frequency than the primary control loop. Integration Approaches Several integration patterns have proven effective for MPC systems: Observer-Based Integration: Implement the IDT as an extended observer that shares state estimation with the MPC but performs entanglement calculations independently, minimizing modifications to the core controller. Solver Integration: For gradient-based MPC solvers, leverage existing sensitivity information from the optimization process to accelerate information gradient calculations, reducing computational overhead. Multi-Rate Implementation: Configure the IDT to operate at a lower frequency than the primary MPC loop, performing comprehensive entanglement analysis every N control cycles while using lightweight monitoring between full updates. Whichever approach you choose, maintain strict separation between adaptation signals and primary control pathways to ensure system stability is preserved during adaptation. Key Design Decisions Critical implementation decisions include: Adaptation Rate Limiting: Implement constraints on both the magnitude and rate of parameter changes to prevent oscillatory adaptation behavior. Typical limits restrict parameter changes to 1-5% per adaptation cycle. Confidence-Based Adaptation: Scale adaptation magnitude based on the statistical confidence in detected misalignments, applying more aggressive adaptation only when patterns are consistently observed across multiple operational cycles. Fallback Mechanisms: Implement safety mechanisms that revert to baseline parameters if adaptation does not improve entanglement metrics within a specified timeframe, preventing potential performance degradation from incorrect adaptations. Multi-Parameter Coordination: When adapting multiple MPC parameters simultaneously, implement coordination constraints that prevent conflicting adaptations that could destabilize the system. Outcomes and Benefits Quantifiable Improvements EL-enhanced MPC systems exhibit several measurable advantages over traditional implementations: Earlier Misalignment Detection: EL typically detects model-reality divergence 50–70% sooner than residual-based methods, enabling preemptive adaptation. Reduced Tracking Error: Continuous adaptation reduces RMS tracking error by 15–30% compared to fixed-parameter MPC in evolving conditions. Wider Operating Range: Information-guided constraint adjustment extends the controller’s stable operating envelope under variable dynamics. Improved Efficiency: Targeted updates reduce the need for full model retraining, lowering computational overhead versus online adaptive MPC. Qualitative Benefits In addition to quantitative gains, EL offers several operational advantages: Deeper Diagnostics: Entanglement metrics reveal why performance degrades—not just when—supporting precise interventions. Reduced Tuning Effort: Information-driven updates minimize manual parameter tuning under changing conditions. Graceful Degradation: Early warnings allow for controlled performance roll-off, avoiding sudden controller failure. Insight Accumulation: Adaptation logs build a data-driven understanding of parameter-behavior links specific to your application. Comparison to Traditional Adaptive MPC Compared to conventional adaptive methods, EL provides unique structural advantages: No Excitation Requirement: EL adapts under normal input conditions, without artificial signal injection. Model-Free Adaptation: EL does not require explicit disturbance models or parameter mappings. Complementary Integration: EL enhances robust or explicit MPC with active adaptation layers. Unified Across Domains: The same EL metrics apply regardless of MPC type or domain, streamlining cross-domain implementation. Together, these outcomes transform MPC from a static optimization engine into a dynamic, self-aligning control system capable of sustaining performance in the face of real-world uncertainty.

Entanglement Learning (EL): A novel AI paradigm quantifying system-environment interactions to guide learning, adaptation, and decision-making in complex environments. From Oversight to Autonomy Physical systems don’t need supervision—they obey constraints. Entanglement Learning enables AI to do the same by maximizing internal information coherence across perception, action, and environmental response. Modern AI systems remain fundamentally dependent on human designers to define their goals, evaluate their performance, and initiate updates. They may recognize patterns and complete tasks—but they lack the ability to detect when their internal models no longer align with the world around them. Entanglement Learning (EL) introduces what’s missing: a universal law based on maximizing information throughput between system and environment. This principle, implemented through the Information Digital Twin (IDT), ensures that systems not only perform tasks but maintain the informational relationships that make adaptation possible. Like physical systems that obey conservation laws, EL-based agents preserve internal–external alignment even as goals and conditions evolve. It reframes intelligence as the sustained management of predictive structure, offering a foundation for autonomy that extends across domains. From Optimization to Alignment: A Paradigm Shift Intelligence is not about solving tasks—it’s about staying aligned with a changing world True intelligence—we argue—is not defined by optimizing goals, but by the mechanisms an agent employs to actively maintain, adapt, and create the information structures necessary for achieving those goals, modifying them, or ultimately defining new ones. Entanglement Learning enables this true intelligence by generating information gradients that not only optimize existing goals but also guide the system towards new objectives that naturally emerge from the drive to maximize information throughput with the environment The Structural Dependence Problem How external supervision breaks down under real-world complexity Even the most advanced AI systems are structurally dependent on human designers to define goals, monitor performance, and initiate updates. This architectural limitation results in fragile systems that must be manually retrained when conditions shift or assumptions break. As environments become more dynamic and tasks more complex, this oversight model becomes unsustainable. Without a universal, built-in mechanism for self-evaluation, AI systems: Can’t detect misalignment until failure occurs Rely on brittle heuristics for adaptation Struggle to generalize across tasks and contexts EL fills this gap through the IDT, which provides continuous, domain-independent performance assessment based on information flow—not human-specified benchmarks. How EL Works Differently EL systems maximize information throughput with their environment rather than optimizing fixed objectives—prioritizing the structured, predictive information exchanged during interaction. This redefines intelligence as maintaining high-fidelity information coupling with reality. The Information Digital Twin implements this by tracking mutual predictability, computing entanglement metrics, and generating adaptive signals when coherence declines. Traditional AI: Define task → Train on data → Optimize objective → Manual retraining Entanglement Learning: Measure information flow → Maximize entanglement → Detect misalignment → Auto-adjust via information gradients EL-enabled systems continuously self-monitor and improve their alignment with the world without human intervention Entanglement Learning in Action EL's architecture consists of four interconnected components that create a self-regulating information loop: 1. Information Measurement — The system continuously samples behavior and transforms observations into probability distributions across states, actions, and outcomes—enabling quantification of information relationships. 2. Entanglement Metrics — Three complementary metrics quantify alignment: * Base Entanglement (ψ): Overall mutual predictability * Asymmetry (Λψ): Source of misalignment * Memory (μψ): Temporal consistency 3. Information Digital Twin (IDT) — This parallel monitoring system analyzes information patterns without disrupting primary operations. When metrics indicate misalignment, the IDT generates information gradients that guide targeted adaptation. 4. Gradient-Based Adaptation — The system follows information gradients to restore optimal entanglement, focusing adjustments on parameters with the strongest influence on information throughput. These components create a continuous cycle of self-improvement: better information flow → more accurate models → more effective actions → enhanced information throughput. Plug-and-Play: EL with Existing systems EL does not replace or disrupt existing learning algorithms. The Information Digital Twin (IDT) operates in parallel, passively monitoring agent-environment alignment and issuing adjustment signals only when needed. This modular, non-intrusive design allows seamless integration with current AI systems—enhancing adaptability without altering core functionalities. The Information Digital Twin (IDT) can be implemented on a separate processor, hardware module, or even hosted remotely in a cloud environment—entirely decoupled from the primary agent’s computational core. This separation allows EL to enhance system adaptability without increasing the agent’s internal complexity or computational burden. Such a modular configuration makes EL highly scalable and easy to integrate into both embedded systems and large-scale AI infrastructures without invasive architectural changes. Entanglement Learning Vision Entanglement Learning isn’t a controller. It’s a principle shared across intelligent systems—enabling adaptation through informational alignment, not orchestration We envision a future where AI systems don’t wait to fail before adapting—where intelligence is defined not by task performance, but by how well a system maintains alignment with a changing world. Entanglement Learning provides the missing architectural layer: an internal, information-based standard of performance. As AI expands into critical systems—autonomous vehicles, infrastructure, medicine, and beyond—dependence on human oversight is no longer viable. By reframing intelligence as continuous information optimization , EL moves beyond static objectives to enable truly adaptive, general-purpose agents. This shift represents a foundational advance, not just for AI capabilities—but for the entire paradigm of machine intelligence.

Contact For inquiries about our research or potential collaborations, please don't hesitate to contact us. For inquiries about the EL concept, its mathematical foundations, or high-level implementation strategy, please also refer to the EL Math page, or consult the EL Reference . Semarx Research | Alexandria, VA, USA | IDT@semarx.com First Name Last Name Email Message Send Thanks for submitting!

Explore how the Human Digital Twin enables real-time alignment between people and technology through multi-domain information flow and adaptive coordination. The Human Digital Twin (HDT) The Human-Specific Variant of the Information Digital Twin Achieving Human–Technology Symbiosis The Human Digital Twin (HDT) extends Entanglement Learning to coordinate information flow between humans and their technological environment. Unlike systems that model human behavior directly, the HDT monitors and optimizes information throughput across multiple domains via a hierarchical architecture of various Information Digital Twins (IDTs). Modern life generates a steady stream of digital traces, which most systems use to optimize technology around business goals—predicting and influencing human behavior for external objectives. The Human Digital Twin (HDT) offers a paradigm shift: instead of mining data, it leverages information patterns to foster mutual predictability between people and their environment. By maximizing information throughput across devices and domains, the HDT creates two-way alignment—making systems more responsive to humans, and humans more attuned to their systems. Rather than using data to control behavior, the HDT redirects it toward shared coherence—building environments that adapt to and amplify human intent. The Opportunity The Human Digital Twin (HDT) offers a paradigm shift: instead of mining data, it leverages information patterns to foster mutual predictability between people and their environment. By maximizing information throughput across devices and domains, the HDT creates two-way alignment—making systems more responsive to humans, and humans more attuned to their systems. Rather than using data to control behavior, the HDT redirects it toward shared coherence—building environments that adapt to and amplify human intent. A Life-Long Companion The Human Digital Twin evolves with its user over time. By continuously tracking patterns across health, behavior, work, and environment, the HDT becomes a personalized interface for long-term adaptation. It doesn't simply respond to momentary inputs—it learns how each person changes, builds memory of their interaction patterns, and adjusts technology accordingly. This makes the HDT not just a monitoring system, but a companion architecture—one that aligns with the human across life stages, roles, and shifting needs. The HDT Architecture The HDT implements a hierarchical structure where domain-specific IDTs monitor information flow between a person and individual technologies, while a coordinating HDT maintains cross-domain coherence. Each domain-specific IDT tracks mutual predictability between a person and a particular system—such as a health device, smart home, vehicle, or professional tool. The HDT integrates these signals to maintain coherence across modalities, without needing to interpret domain-specific content—similar to how higher brain functions coordinate across sensory systems without processing raw data. This architecture enables technology to adapt around human state and intent in real time, achieving a new level of human–system balance—or, in deeper terms, symbiosis. This multi-layered approach enables comprehensive optimization without requiring the HDT to process domain-specific content—similar to how higher brain functions coordinate across sensory systems without processing raw sensory data. A New Layer of Human–System Intelligence Core Capabilities The HDT enables cross-domain pattern recognition, preemptive adaptation, and personalized system alignment—detecting subtle shifts in information flow before traditional metrics fail. It coordinates across devices to prevent conflicting behaviors, transforming disconnected technologies into a coherent, human-aligned ecosystem. Implementation Framework HDT implementation begins by deploying domain-specific IDTs, each configured with tailored state-action representations and discretization strategies. These IDTs compute local entanglement metrics, which the central HDT uses to manage system-wide information coherence via standardized, domain-agnostic signals—allowing scalable integration as new technologies emerge. Application Domains The HDT is especially valuable in healthcare (for non-verbal patient monitoring), productivity (for cognitive load management), assisted living (for responsive environments), and complex operations (for human-machine teaming). In each case, it ensures coherent information flow across diverse subsystems. Ethical Considerations Unlike systems that extract and process sensitive content, the HDT operates on abstract information patterns, reducing privacy risk while preserving function. Its bidirectional nature—where humans also understand the system—promotes autonomy and rebalances the human-technology relationship. Future Directions Next steps include integration with neural interfaces, group-level coordination across multiple HDTs, adaptive personalization across user populations, and research into how information throughput relates to well-being. These advances position the HDT as foundational infrastructure for ethical, human-aligned digital ecosystems.

Entanglement Learning (EL): A novel AI paradigm quantifying system-environment interactions to guide learning, adaptation, and decision-making in complex environments. The EL Vision: Toward Humanoid Intelligence Physical systems don’t need supervision—they obey constraints. Entanglement Learning enables AI to do the same by maximizing internal information coherence across perception, action, and environmental response. The Quest for Humanoid Intelligence From multimodal sensing to adaptive reasoning, the challenge isn’t components—it’s integration Modern AI systems excel at narrow tasks—perception, control, planning—each relying on its own specialized, task-specific representation. But humanoid intelligence demands more than advanced components. It emerges when these components coordinate through a shared internal language—a structural representation that integrates local functions into global system behavior. This common representational layer is what allows humans to adapt, improvise, and maintain coherence across changing contexts. Entanglement Learning (EL) introduces this missing capability: a universal metric—information throughput—that serves as a common reference across all subsystems . It enables AI to operate not as disconnected modules, but as a cohesive, adaptive system capable of maintaining alignment without external supervision. The path to humanoid intelligence isn't just better subsystems—it’s the information architecture that unifies them into a functioning whole. Why Current AI Can't Scale Autonomously (GPT) Intelligence is not about solving tasks—it’s about staying aligned with a changing world True intelligence—we argue—is not defined by optimizing goals, but by the mechanisms an agent employs to actively maintain, adapt, and create the information structures necessary for achieving those goals, modifying them, or ultimately defining new ones. Entanglement Learning enables this true intelligence by generating information gradients that not only optimize existing goals but also guide the system towards new objectives that naturally emerge from the drive to maximize information throughput with the environment EL as a Cognitive Infrastructure (GPT) How external supervision breaks down under real-world complexity Even the most advanced AI systems are structurally dependent on human designers to define goals, monitor performance, and initiate updates. This architectural limitation results in fragile systems that must be manually retrained when conditions shift or assumptions break. As environments become more dynamic and tasks more complex, this oversight model becomes unsustainable. Without a universal, built-in mechanism for self-evaluation, AI systems: Can’t detect misalignment until failure occurs Rely on brittle heuristics for adaptation Struggle to generalize across tasks and contexts EL fills this gap through the IDT, which provides continuous, domain-independent performance assessment based on information flow—not human-specified benchmarks. Infographic: Humanoid EL Architecture (GPT) EL systems maximize information throughput with their environment rather than optimizing fixed objectives—prioritizing the structured, predictive information exchanged during interaction. This redefines intelligence as maintaining high-fidelity information coupling with reality. The Information Digital Twin implements this by tracking mutual predictability, computing entanglement metrics, and generating adaptive signals when coherence declines. Traditional AI: Define task → Train on data → Optimize objective → Manual retraining Entanglement Learning: Measure information flow → Maximize entanglement → Detect misalignment → Auto-adjust via information gradients EL-enabled systems continuously self-monitor and improve their alignment with the world without human intervention The Path to Humanoid Intelligence (GRK) EL's architecture consists of four interconnected components that create a self-regulating information loop: 1. Information Measurement — The system continuously samples behavior and transforms observations into probability distributions across states, actions, and outcomes—enabling quantification of information relationships. 2. Entanglement Metrics — Three complementary metrics quantify alignment: * Base Entanglement (ψ): Overall mutual predictability * Asymmetry (Λψ): Source of misalignment * Memory (μψ): Temporal consistency 3. Information Digital Twin (IDT) — This parallel monitoring system analyzes information patterns without disrupting primary operations. When metrics indicate misalignment, the IDT generates information gradients that guide targeted adaptation. 4. Gradient-Based Adaptation — The system follows information gradients to restore optimal entanglement, focusing adjustments on parameters with the strongest influence on information throughput. These components create a continuous cycle of self-improvement: better information flow → more accurate models → more effective actions → enhanced information throughput. Call to Action EL does not replace or disrupt existing learning algorithms. The Information Digital Twin (IDT) operates in parallel, passively monitoring agent-environment alignment and issuing adjustment signals only when needed. This modular, non-intrusive design allows seamless integration with current AI systems—enhancing adaptability without altering core functionalities. The Information Digital Twin (IDT) can be implemented on a separate processor, hardware module, or even hosted remotely in a cloud environment—entirely decoupled from the primary agent’s computational core. This separation allows EL to enhance system adaptability without increasing the agent’s internal complexity or computational burden. Such a modular configuration makes EL highly scalable and easy to integrate into both embedded systems and large-scale AI infrastructures without invasive architectural changes. Entanglement Learning Vision (remove!) Entanglement Learning isn’t a controller. It’s a principle shared across intelligent systems—enabling adaptation through informational alignment, not orchestration We envision a future where AI systems don’t wait to fail before adapting—where intelligence is defined not by task performance, but by how well a system maintains alignment with a changing world. Entanglement Learning provides the missing architectural layer: an internal, information-based standard of performance. As AI expands into critical systems—autonomous vehicles, infrastructure, medicine, and beyond—dependence on human oversight is no longer viable. By reframing intelligence as continuous information optimization , EL moves beyond static objectives to enable truly adaptive, general-purpose agents. This shift represents a foundational advance, not just for AI capabilities—but for the entire paradigm of machine intelligence.